Making the Visioneering Process Work for You
December 10th, 2012Leadership, Ministry Help No CommentsIt would be foolish, or at best naive, for any of us to believe or even infer that what works for others will
work for you as well. The Vision process, or Visioneering, is included in that statement. There is no cookie-cutter formula that works and produces for everyone. However, there is a common development route, or process, that can be modified to suit your environment, and it will work for everyone if allowed to. There are questions to ponder and ask at the inception of the Visioneering process.
Why is this important? It is important because every leader, church, or organization is not ready to undertake a successful Visioneering process. Before you waste your time and that of others you need to validate that this is the right thing for you to do.
To do this you will have to determine some things. Every church or business has its own unique and distinguishing traits and characteristics, including but not limited to:
· The number people and talents it has available
· The unity it either has or doesn’t have
· The spiritual maturity and understanding level of the people
· The level of commitment to excellence and continuous improvement
· The work ethic
· The corporate attitude
· Financial and resource strengths and/or weaknesses
· Demographics
What are yours? Write them down clearly and concisely. Do the necessary research. Thoroughness and honesty are absolutely essential.
Next, of course there are many other ingredients that must be considered as well, including but not limited to:
· The connection between the leader and the people
· The level of trust and confidence in leadership
· The size and commitment to and understanding of teamwork
· The organizational structure
· Area demographics (white or blue collar/wealthy or welfare/educated or non-educated/innovative or non-innovative/adaptability to change or resistance to any change, multicultural blend and ethnicity traits/ and etc.)
· The culture of the area and of the church
Once again, write these down clearly and concisely as well. Do the necessary research. Thoroughness and honesty are absolutely essential.
Next, it is very important to accurately ascertain the current state of affairs. You must find answers to the following questions and others like them:
· Where you are as an organization at this point in time?
· What type of cooperation exists?
· How effectively do you communicate as a leader?
· How open you are to the involvement of others?
· Are you a controller or a liberator?
· Are you willing and able to truly empower and trust others?
· Are you (and the people) willing to change the way you do things and the organizational structure as necessary to accomplish the things that must be done to progress toward a vision?
· Are people willing to change titles, roles, and positions if necessary? Will they be selfless or jealous as changes occur?
Once again, write these down clearly and concisely as well. Do the necessary research. Thoroughness and honesty are absolutely essential.
And then there are the big all-important questions that must be answered even before you proceed further:
· Do I believe this is God’s time for us to launch forward toward new horizons?
· Am I committed to the long-term?
· Am I convinced that I must do this in order for the church or organization to reach a higher potential?
· Am I willing to face adversity knowing that people resist being changed?
· Is what we are doing working?
· What is not working?
· Can we reach our potential without changing?
Once again, write these down clearly and concisely as well. Do the necessary research. Thoroughness and honesty are absolutely essential.
Next, this initial phase of visioneering needs to include:
· An accurate inventory and assessment of the way things are
Once again, write these down clearly and concisely as well. Do the necessary research. Thoroughness and honesty are absolutely essential.
Now ask yourself the following question: Do I have the commitment and resolve to drive this forward, even though I do not yet have a clear picture of exactly where this will lead us?
If the answer to the last question is no then simply stop right here. If the answer is yes then please continue.
As a mentor, I would suggest to any leader that is interested in directing your church or organization toward a new and worthwhile vision that you:
Here are a few tips (Steps) to accomplish the aforementioned things:
1. Set aside a time and place for quiet reflection for yourself (alone)
a. Walk though each aforementioned point and write down every thought
b. Organize them and delete redundancy
2. Set aside a time to do the same with your inner-circle of leaders
a. Keep your personal notes confidential at this time
b. Allow them to walk through Step 1 completely as you remain mostly silent. The more you talk the less they will contribute.
c. After they have finished compare your personal notes with their notes
d. Together with them combine the two as much as possible into one document. This is a great time for discussion and critical evaluation to occur.


I have solutions. I am good at what I do. However, all too often my attempts to help prove futile because leaders are notorious for not allowing themselves to see beyond assumed responsibilities and circumstances. They have problems focusing. For some it might be their Attention Deficit Disorder kicking in, and for others it is simply personal neglect. Just as a mechanic’s car often needs the most repair, and a plumber’s house needs a leaky faucet fixed, leaders seem to avoid personal changes of routine and lifestyle.

years ago. As shocking as it may sound, statistics validate that 99 out of 100 babies in orphanages died before reaching the age of seven months!The institutions themselves were not the problem. They had adequate food, clean environments, and modern antiseptic procedures. Everything to give these unwanted or otherwise orphaned children a safe and secure environment was in place, and yet 99% of the infants died within months after birth. These babies were given a healthy chance at life and yet they died anyway. The cause of these deaths was an illusive mystery for many years. Research studies have long since revealed that these babies did not die from malnutrition or infectious diseases, but instead they wasted away in a human condition known as “marasmus”. Marasmus claimed these countless little lives in spite of clean and sterile environments and adequate food, shelter and clothing. Marasmus can be caused by the deprivation of human touch. Babies without adequate human touch can simply waste away and die regardless of their surroundings and environment. When babies suffering from marasmus receive physical nurturing while being fed their formula the marasmus reverses. They begin to gain weight and thrive. Human touch is vital for survival in the very young. The System Was Changed Although it is tragic that countless infants died from marasmus’ deadly consequences resulting from the absence of human touch, it fostered change. Today’s infants that are isolated in sterile environments are taken into the hands of caregivers who give them loving touch therapy three times a day for fifteen minutes. Taking these infants out of their cribs and holding and rocking them by volunteers has reversed the mortality rate. Research has validated that the infants receiving this personal touch grow faster, gain more weight, and leave the facility sooner that other untouched infants do. The infants are not the only beneficiaries of this “touching” time. Those who volunteer as caregivers or “grandparents” to hold, rock, touch and massage these infants also experience measurable benefits. They reduce their coffee and caffeine intake and make less frequent visits to their doctor. They experience a reduction in anxiety levels, fewer symptoms of depression, and improved self-esteem. Touch is powerful. When skin touches skin magical consequences occur. Human touch and contact is directly linked to every aspect of health and well-being.
affliction, with joy of the Holy Ghost:”
Esau. Although twins, these two boys were radically different. Esau loved the outdoors and became a hunter. Jacob preferred to stay at home and learned how to cook. Esau was born first and was covered in hair. Jacob was born second with a death grip on his brother’s heel. Esau became a daddy’s boy. Jacob was sheltered by his mother. Without sharing the entire story, I will fast forward to a part of the story that has always bothered me.Note the four statements in bold type;

highly ineffective pastors and how you can avoid them

Recent Comments